Do we really need invisible anchor tags? The section headers are already anchor tags by default.--RosicrucianTalk 03:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I think so, yes. This way, when we say "Toy X was redecoed to make Toy Y", or "Character X was homaged in Toy Y", or we can link DIRECTLY to that toy, not to its subheader. We can say "the original Optimus Prime toy was also redecoed, as the same character, in {{JAFCON|black Convoy}}, {{SNADCON|Super Deluxe Happy}}..." that would appear under the same subheader but may not be on the screen, because some subheaders can be long. Plus this keeps the TOC down.
Plus, this gives a good reason to start crawling through character pages again for maintenance... because I've noticed a lot of pages missing things that just got... forgotten. And not every stub page is marked as one... --M Sipher 03:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I vote for it. --Sntint 03:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
A quick test-run, cross-linking TM2 Cheetor DIRECTLY to TM2 Tripredacus Agent and back again, was successful. I'd actually been mulling over something like this off and on for a long time now, but the whole Movie Bumblebee thing got me thinking about these kind of links again. I think this will be quite useful for longer toy pages... and now that I think about it, can also serve to point to specific Trivia bullets as well. --M Sipher 04:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.