FANDOM


...facinating. That makes it sound like he actually has a emissary mod, nto a full-fledged lion transformation. -Derik 19:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Or it's just a very literal name. --ItsWalky 20:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Proposed move

I say don't move. Under-3 is good enough. Is "Lionhead" really a name either? --Steve-o 15:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

UNDER-3 FOREVER. --ItsWalky 17:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure if we should move this or not. We do have a policy using the US names when available, but we actually know for a fact that "Lionhead" is a name. Whay might clear this up is the bags the toys came in. I shall explain in Java:


public void under3Name(under3){

if ((under3.bagLayout()).equals(panther.bagLayout())
{
if ((under3.nameLocation()).equals(panther.nameLocation()))
{
under3.SetName("Under-3");
return;
}
if ((under3.nameLocation()).equals(panther.ageLocation()))
{
under3.SetName("Lionhead");
return;
}
}
else if ((under3.bagLayout()).equals(other1997HappyMealUnder3.bagLayout))
{
if ((under3.nameLocation()).equals(other1997HappyMealUnder3.nameLocation()))
{
if (other1997HappyMealUnder3.name()).equals("Under-3")
{
under3.SetName("Lionhead");
return;
}
else
{
under3.setName("Under-3");
return;
}
}
}
under3.setName(vote())
return;

}

--FortMax 17:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

That was really...necessary. In any case, yes, "Under-3" appears in the same place and style as "Beetle", "Panther", et cetera on the other four McBeasts. -LV 17:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I was having trouble writing in plain old English without rambling, and figured programing-style if statements would be the easiest way and then decided to go the full distance. The sad thing is, I spent less time on the code than I did using regular sentences. --FortMax 18:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
I think you should see a doctor. However, I agree with your arguement despite. --Sntint 03:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.