Should we really say he's a "fairly high-ranking officer?" Sure he's got a tech spec rank of "8" but his function is only "Supplies and Transport" and the bio say nothing about him being a command figure. I'm just curious, is the rank score alone enough to make that call in most folks books? -ZacWilliam, not logged in.

It's just a joke on the fact that middle-managers are often employees with no real skills. And because all 1993 Euro tech specs had high stats, regardless of function. --FFN 15:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thing is, since we put neither the stat numbers nor character functions in our entries someone comming across him who has no background in the character has no way to know it's a joke. I think this may be one of those times where the joke gets in the way of a usefully factual entry. If you didn't know anything else about him you wouldn't get the joke and you'd think we we're saying "dull senior officer" is his official characterization and it's really not at all. See what I mean? -Zac again.
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.