Mini-Mayhem comics are canon? Sure, they pass the cardinal rule of "approved by Hasbro and/or Takara," but doesn't the strip's tongue-in-cheek nature select itself out? Like... I don't think Visitations would've been canon without Omega Point having incorporated it as backstory, and even then we tread lightly regarding which parts are "true."
Admittedly, I can't think of a hard-and-fast rule to determine whether any given story is too comedic to be "real." But as a matter of taste, I don't think Mini-Mayhem should be included here. Or, at the very least, we shouldn't mix references to it with the rest of the multiverse. - Jackpot 02:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- If The Beast Within is canon, the mini-mayhems are canon.
- (Though we seem to be documenting the events of the latter only when they add to the universe / are exceptionally hilarious. )
- I happen to think knowing that The Fallen once shot down a ship full of bumble-puppies is a siginifigant addition to his otherwise unexplored backstory. -Derik 02:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Mini-Mayhem is definitely canon. It's applicability in terms of continuity is up in the air, however. Sub-commander's day may or may not exist in continuities outside that of the strip itself, just as with any other canonical story. If you think it's weight is being overstated someplace, Jack, go ahead and revise accordingly. I think keeping the references in there in some way -- even if it's clearly silly -- would be appreciated, though. --Steve-o 19:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC)