Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki

Welcome to Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki. You may wish to create or login to an account in order to have full editing access to this wiki.

READ MORE

Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki

...is this the official name for this weapon? Has it been referred to as this?--RosicrucianTalk 16:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I think Blitzwing just referred to it as "the punch" in Lost and Found. I don't recall any other names for it. --Professor Icepick 16:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Well the material Unicron.com got referred to it as some "rocket powered punch" so I guess that's the right name.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.103.119.220 (talkcontribs) 16:22, 19 April 2008.
Have a link for that? What is Unicron.com basing that off of? Is this a feature noted on the toy's packaging?--RosicrucianTalk 16:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I think Unicron.com was the first site to post the official Animated bios and publicity images. --FFN 17:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
If correct it needs to be moved to Rocket Punch anyway. --2A6 17:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't think this article needs to exist. It can all just go into Lugnut's article. We don't, and shouldn't, have separate pages for Bumblebee's stingers or Bulkhead's wrecking ball or Prowl's shuriken, or BW Silverbolt's feather missiles, or G1 Rumble's piledrivers. --Thylacine 2000 17:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Speaking of which, the Lugnut page itself could use a bit of clean-up. --Professor Icepick 18:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
But we do have separate articles for shitloads of crazy weapons of all kinds. Why's this so different? -- Repowers 06:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

This is about one of his weapons,and there are threads about fusion cannons and neet guns,so why does this one has to go?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TrackStars57 (talkcontribs) 20:31, 3 May 2008.

One, there is no official name for this weapon. Two, it is not appreciably a separate thing from Lugnut himself. It's his frigging fist.--RosicrucianTalk 20:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Also the vast majority of weapons in this Wiki are well known and either are present in multiple continuities or are used by many characters. (Undecided) 20:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Look, in its current state, it should probably be deleted. It's not really written to our manual of style, there's some original research present, and it's not officially named. However, if a name is given for it in the future, I'd see no reason to make it again. -- SFH 17:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
So how long is this article going to be pending deletion anyway? People seem to be adding more content, but the article still doesn't seem to be up to standard (in my opinion). I really don't think this article should exist even if it was written well, and this has been going on for a month now. (Undecided) 22:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
The admins can be a little selective on what they delete. You should see how large To be deleted is. -- SFH 22:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
With the cleanup and name change, it's not nearly as irritating as the original article. Before I thought it reflected very poorly on this wiki, but it's mere existence doesn't frustrate me anymore. I still don't think it should exist, but it is in much better shape now and I could live with it as a permanent article. (Undecided) 21:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)