No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The CGI model of Leobreaker being designed to have a more coherent hand mode that was based on an earlier design is debatable. Looks more to me like the toy only with fingers and a thumb 'magically' appearing out of nowhere, but that's me. |
The CGI model of Leobreaker being designed to have a more coherent hand mode that was based on an earlier design is debatable. Looks more to me like the toy only with fingers and a thumb 'magically' appearing out of nowhere, but that's me. |
||
: We have photos of the earlier design. I should upload those. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 18:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
: We have photos of the earlier design. I should upload those. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 18:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | : Done! --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 18:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ---- |
||
I would lean towards to thinking this article should be at "Leobreaker (UT)," with Overhaul as the redirect, with the character's role being somewhat more prominent in his second form than in his original. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 08:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC) |
I would lean towards to thinking this article should be at "Leobreaker (UT)," with Overhaul as the redirect, with the character's role being somewhat more prominent in his second form than in his original. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 08:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:36, 18 January 2007
The CGI model of Leobreaker being designed to have a more coherent hand mode that was based on an earlier design is debatable. Looks more to me like the toy only with fingers and a thumb 'magically' appearing out of nowhere, but that's me.
- We have photos of the earlier design. I should upload those. --ItsWalky 18:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Done! --ItsWalky 18:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
I would lean towards to thinking this article should be at "Leobreaker (UT)," with Overhaul as the redirect, with the character's role being somewhat more prominent in his second form than in his original. --KilMichaelMcC 08:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
My gut reaction is to say "No, you always have to start with the first body", but...we don't have the pages at Optronix, Ariel and A3. I guess what I really mean is "You have to start with the first body that appeared fictionally", but...Wing Saber, not Wing Dagger. So I guess what I REALLY really mean is "You have to start with the first toy". -LV 17:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- "First toy" seems right to me. We do have Rodimus Prime redirecting to Hot Rod, after all. --67.170.195.216 20:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)