I had heard that Energon featured the Combiners as ancient Deceptions that likely predate Megatron. I havn't seen it myself but just throwing it out there. Also G1 Cartoon vs. Comic bots should likely get seperate entries, since there's the whole "military hardware" lineage to mention for the toon, and the "Liege Maximo" as Megatron's ancestor, for the comic. ZacWilliam 00:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Energon confuses the shit out of me. I don't think anyone actually THOUGHT about what they were writing.
Any rate, yeah, for G1 we really should separate the two major continuities. I mean, the cartoon at once point says Megatron wasn't the first Decepticon... but had said he WAS earlier... SPEAKING of not thinking... --M Sipher 00:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • The Dorling Kindersly Book,makes him out as a Decepticon Pit Fighter who battled his way up through the ranks to ,there is also the other statuary visible during Starscream's coronation that tends to lend credence to Megatron not being the first Decepticon,but the latest leader in a long line descending from the Quintesson's original military hardware product line.

In Wreckers, Al Badur, who'd been exiled from Cybertron since prior to the Quint uprising, refers to Autobots and Decepticons. I'd say that the military line was CALLED the Decepticons. (And their sigil was likely their glave-brand, albeit as warriors, not servants) If Megatron 'founded' the Decepticon movement, he could be 'refounding' it, or co-opting what was otherwise an unrelated historical legacy. (Which is weak, but it has the maerit of threadign the needle between the conflicting evidence of War Dawn, FFoD and Desertion of the Dinobots.) -Derik 01:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


Just sprucing things up. ChoHIlqoq 18:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.