Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki

Welcome to Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki. You may wish to create or login to an account in order to have full editing access to this wiki.

READ MORE

Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki

That caption kind of shits me, as its yet another lame 'Take a pot shot at Cybertron's animation'. Given her only official toy HAS high heels... --FFN 04:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

The caption has to do with Female Stereotyping, not Cybertron, dude. --ItsWalky 04:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
So did Hasbro put those high heels into their designs of Energon Arcee and Cyb. Thunderblast (the most randomly named female Transformer ever)? --FFN 04:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
They put them on TM2 Blackarachnia! Because, you know, girl. And, yeah, I imagine they designed Energon Arcee. We saw their art of her. But I'm still not sure how you're getting a Cybertron jab from this at all. Please diagram it for me! --ItsWalky 05:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
... do you need a lie-down and some aspirin? You're very insensible right now. --M Sipher 05:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I had assumed it was the one in the series of jabs against Cybertron, such as the crack in BM Thrust's page about him having more expression than the entire Cybertron cast (which is admittedly true), then another one in for Lori's 'angry faces' montage (which I changed as it was overstated). Anyway, I assumed this was another one due to my observation that you guys don't like Cybertron's animation. Sorry for assuming the wrong thing.
As for female stereotyping, why don't you guys take up this matter with Aaron and co? They seem to be at least partially responsible. --FFN 05:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure Aaron and co aren't responsible for the G1 Female Autobots! --ItsWalky 05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I meant if they participated in the designs of recent female Transformer figures that have stereotypical feminine designs features (perhaps even adding those design cues themselves), then they are partly responsible for perpetuating 'problem'. Such as it is. --FFN 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, yes, of course. And? --ItsWalky 15:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)