(bots can do automated drudgery) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I don't know any of the details, but on Wikipedia, some users run bots that can do this sort of cleanup automatically. You might be able to figure out how to do that by poking around at that site. I may look into it at some point, but... also maybe not. If it's on your mind, though, go for it. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 06:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC) |
I don't know any of the details, but on Wikipedia, some users run bots that can do this sort of cleanup automatically. You might be able to figure out how to do that by poking around at that site. I may look into it at some point, but... also maybe not. If it's on your mind, though, go for it. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 06:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Meh. It's not like you can't just put up a relay (Decepticons has one) but I think naming standards is better. Hopefully having IMPOSED a standard, future entries will adhere. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 06:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:42, 29 March 2006
Articles were linkign to either Autobot or Autobots willy-nilly. Autobot, singular, was favored 3:1. I have gone back and changed all links from Autobots to Autobot.
Reading as I went, in SOME cases, the term 'Autobots' could be better served by linkign to a sub-page (such as 'the Armada Autobots') when they refer to a discrete group. But- those links would have ot be re-done ANYWAY, should such a page come into existance. I feel comfortable in my decision, and feel the singular form is the sensible way to go.
Off to change the Decepticons mis-links. There the ratio favors singular more like 7:1. (Can admins do this esily? I dunno.) -Derik 05:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Good call. And, no, I don't believe Admins can do it any more easily than ye. --ItsWalky 05:50, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't know any of the details, but on Wikipedia, some users run bots that can do this sort of cleanup automatically. You might be able to figure out how to do that by poking around at that site. I may look into it at some point, but... also maybe not. If it's on your mind, though, go for it. --Steve-o 06:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Meh. It's not like you can't just put up a relay (Decepticons has one) but I think naming standards is better. Hopefully having IMPOSED a standard, future entries will adhere. -Derik 06:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)