Things like category and link changes should really be done as minor edits, so people can hide them on the Recent Changes page. Especially when you do dozens of them at once. - Dark T Zeratul 09:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, you can save yourself a lot of time by asking me to have the DiagnosticDrone do it. He can easily do repetitive tasks such as adding/removing categories, text replacements, etc.. Provide a list of pages you want fixed, or say "all pages in this category should be changed", or "anything that links to this should be fixed" or something and I can have it done with almost zero effort in almost no time and without it clogging up the changes page. --Steve-o 21:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I've asked Steve-o for mass changes if it was anything over 15 links to be changed-- both because it's easier for the 'bot to do it, and because the bot's actions are hidden in history. (he fixed all the Bumblebee links when we got a move version.) -Derik 21:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Movie timeline articleEdit

Is that really much of an uncorroborated claim? It has a source provided, so I think it'd be fairly easy to check up on. --Sntint 21:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I've asked three people who bought the novelization to check, and they've all said "If it's in there, I haven't found it." I guess I could pick up a copy at Barnes & Noble for reference if you're still unsure. -Rotty 23:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
I can also pick up a copy, and I will. I just think it is bizarre that a fictious statement would have a source. I hope my contention with the deletion has not offended you. It was not evident to me from the edit summary that other people had been consulted. --Sntint 23:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I did indeed consult several people. It's not a problem. -Rotty 00:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.