Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki

Welcome to Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki. You may wish to create or login to an account in order to have full editing access to this wiki.

READ MORE

Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki
Register
Advertisement

So are you actually TRYING to get yourself a vandalism ban now, Derik? --KilMichaelMcC 07:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, at least its funny vandalism. Those 3H/FP comics deserve all the shit they get and more. But yeah, inappropriate. --DrSpengler 07:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh, it's so unfair to make fun of the Fun Pub stuff. Poor defenseless fancruft crying rheumy little tears...
I maintain that the diagram is an entirely accurate depiction of Fun Pub's storytelling, and a serious addition to the article. I am willing to reformat the labels into a less... accurate... overall picture if necessary to keep it. -Derik 07:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
You don't actually think I mentioned the possibility of you getting a vandalism ban because you were "making fun of the Fun Pub stuff", right? --KilMichaelMcC 07:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Heh, no, I'm not that damaged. I just figured making fun of the Fun Pub stuff some more would put everyone in a better mood! (I notice you don't seem to be arguing that my overall characterization is wrong, merely inappropriate.)
In all seriousness, aside from the pic, how does the article look? It has some rough edges, but I'm fairly pleased with how it turned out. -Derik 07:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
"Critics characterize these additions as 'completely missing the--" You vandalized that too. That word does not belong in an encyclopedia about a CHILDREN'S PROPERTY. -Rotty 07:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
I have to question your use of the term 'vandalization' for a section that never existed before. I would perhaps insert in it's place "wrote and added to the value of the article while making a specific note drawing others attention to this section I aware I lack an impartial viewpoint on, knowing they would doubtless wish to moderate it." (I have faith in the collaborative, and often combative, system to settle on an acceptable consensus.)
One cannot vandalize that which does not exist. And something that has never existed in a prior state cannot be said to be 'vandalized' upon first coming into existence, because the word itself requires a change to have taken place. Precision in language is a virtue. -Derik 08:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
By your logic, when someone adds a new paragraph to the first section of Mark Antony's Wikipedia entry consisting entirely of HE SMELLS LIKE POOP, deleting it isn't cleaning up vandalism because he added something that has never existed in a prior state. -Rotty 09:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
But historical records dating back to the first century C.E. indicate that Mark Antony in fact did smell like poop! -hx 10:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
This is an encyclopedia about a children's property. Children are using this Wiki to look things up. Get rid of what you've uploaded here, Derik. -Rotty 07:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Pfft. Well you're not fun. -Derik 07:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
I take it back, you left the passive-aggressive language in and added a citation year. You are pretty fun! -Derik 07:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
MY GOD WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!? That being said, I don't like this because it is treading dangerously close to "uncyclopedia" levels of unfunny. SEE IT LOOKS LIKE A PECKER BECAUSE FUNPUB IS JUST JERKING OFF ALL OVER THE PAGES BUHHHHHHHH (as if we're doing anything better here. this is an inherently masturbatory thing. that is the pot calling the kettle colored.) -hx 10:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
It has the class and dignity of something from 4chan.--Zodberg 10:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
You DO realize this is a goddamn toy robot wiki, don't you? Class and dignity are unknown concepts. -hx 17:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Advertisement