Is it REALLY neccessary to sub-categorize "exclusives"? I'm not evenconvinced we need an "exclusives" category to BEGIN with, let alone sub-categories for every damn chain that GETS them. --M Sipher 01:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

I like it. --ItsWalky 02:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Isn't the fact that the toys are exclusives a pretty important fact about the toys; especially since it's the only reason of existence for some of the toys? I only did the stores with a good amount of exclusives; there's no CostCo, Hasbro Toy Shop, or Toys Dream Project categories because there's only very few toys that would fit in those categories. Singularity 02:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


I'm not sure how you'd go about doing it, but the company's name is properly "Kmart," not K-Mart. As long as we're striving for accuracy, it might be worth renaming this category. Buttbutt 23:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.