User talk:ItsWalky

--I'm deeply sorry

2006 Archives

2007 Archives

Things to say to you


Just some thing I've been wanting to say to David...

First off, you're a monumental asshole. You have an ego the size of a small planet and it's irritating watching you act like an important SOB when you're basically just a nobody.

Second, your webcomics aren't funny. They're boring tripe that makes Penny Arcade look good(and believe me, Penny Arcade is garbage). Cyanide and Happiness is a funny webcomic, yours is not. Your "jokes" are painful, about like watching Michael Richards yell the n-word as a routine. You don't draw a comic, you draw an opinionated blog. I'm not sure which name suits your crap better, "ShitPacked" or "ShortDicked".

Your liberalism and your love of Indiana get on my nerves. You jab at Mallard Filmore? Yeah, one shitty comic making fun of another shitty comic. Or are you just pissed that his gets in newspapers while you're JUST a webcomic? As to Indiana, I live here, and if it were up to me, the state would be walled off and none of the freaks living there allowed to interact with the rest of the planet. The state is about 3 decades behind the times. But something tells me even you know this otherwise you'd still live here. I sure as hell do not live here by choice and as soon as I can, I'm moving far away from this joke of a state.

And your brand loyalty is typical fandom crap. You have Aaron Archer's rod so far down your throat it's unreal. And Aryan fucktard Michael Bay's rod has apparently joined it. I'd say soemthing abotu Don Murphy but he was born without one. Actually, I can say something- he's Kevin "unfunny asshole" Smith with more body fat. Hasbro didn't give the film to a competent director, just a cheap one. And neither Speilberg or ILM have done anything useful in years. Give WETA, or even Tom Savini a chance and we wouldn't be getting Bionicle bots. You're afraid to not like a Hasbro product. No wonder they don't have to go out of the way to please the "fans"- you'll accept it no matter what. But hey, you personally have been sucking off incompetent British bonehead Simon Furman and his shitty stories for years. There are no gods in Transformers. Unicron was built by a monkey, little man. Furman is dog shit.

And go figure this TF wiki is a joke full of misinformation, insults or outright lies- you're a mod here. You're never right. You're more of an incorrect pompous jerkoff than Defunct is. Right, ban me from editing, as if it would somehow matter, any info you don't agree with is pulled. You only have friends because people feel sorry for you. Me, I have no need. People are a commodity to be used and their wants only get in the way of what I'm out for. Use them and drop them.

Who am I? Go look who added a note about you on Encyclopedia Dramatica's Allspark page if you're not too lazy. As well as past AS, Kalidor, FIRRIB and Hooks entries(the hooks entry especially true). Oh, and just info on white people in general and that idiotic Nintendo Wii. I'm not making it that easy for you.
 * Is it my birthday? This stuff feeds me.  --ItsWalky 02:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree with that guy! ItsWalky, you're an asswhole!! --FIELDMAN 298 8:14 PM January 2008 (UTC)
 * Asswhole? Does that mean that Walky can entirely fit into an ass or that he is fully composed of ass? —Interrobang 05:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Duuuuude. Walky may be a dick, but I still like him for some inexplicable reason. You, on the other hand, are just one sore drama queen.--Nevermore 17:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * This is some of the most funny stuff I've seen in a while. Comedy PLATINUM. --M Sipher 02:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Bwa ha ha ha ha. Priceless.  I think someone needs to get off the internets for a few minutes. Chip 02:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Wait, you mean I didn't get drunk and write this? -hx 05:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I wish lame puns happened to me. Interrobang 20:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Why do I get the feeling that guy has been permanently banned?Mr. Florky 15:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

BANNED
What the hell did I do to warrant a ban, exactly? As far as I'm aware, I don't even think I broke any rules, and if I did, an official warning would be appropriate. I received no such warning. I was not here for trolling and you know that - you use that bullshit excuse to get people to ignore arguments you can't handle. But you, personally, who made this decision, know I'm not a troll.

This is fucking low. I had little enough respect for you down to your ranting against the fanbase, Willis, but this is a whole new level of buggery. If you're going to use your comic to rant against and discredit people you don't like, the least you can do is suck it up when people rant at you back, and not act like a control-freak child.

I really don't think you're aware of your own actions anymore.
 * Do the words no personal attacks mean anything to you? -- SFH 00:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Do the words "warning before ban" mean anything to you? Rulemongering doesn't justify a decision anyway, since Walky is one of the people making the rules. There were plenty of personal attacks leveled at me, but I did not report them officially.


 * I really find it hard to believe that you think it's completely on a rational level of discourse to claim that the comic strip I draw is about child pornography.  If I'm not mistaken about your identity, you've been banned from almost every single Transformers web board you've had an acquaintance with, and I'm only doing this place a favor by getting rid of you.  --ItsWalky 00:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * That's not an excuse. I will openly admit I HAVE been banned from several forums, but only because I repeatedly opposed the staff on each and every one of them; and with good cause, they all have roughly the same problem. People bully others either into liking the movie or to agree with the kind of views you promote - and since nobody can directly attack or discredit anyone, these people(and you are) are left to their methods.
 * For your current decision to be validated, the admins of those boards, boards which are influenced in turn by your anti-fan attitude, would have to be near 100% correct in their decisions, and those decisions would have to occur within a context that would map exactly onto here. Any rational moderator does not base their decisions so much off performance on other boards, especially when it's not even a messageboard they're operating. Two different media. I have openly said I despise all active Transformers boards for their level of authoritarianism, yet level of tolerance towards the pushing of certain viewpoints.


 * Not to mention that you're still operating under the fallacy of Appeal to Majority - that alone means I shouldn't really even have to counter you.


 * And don't even use the "CHILD PORNOGRAPHY" thing as an excuse. Again, any rational moderator would warn several times before a ban, I personally reversed that edit even though it was obviously intended to be a joke as anyone reading this knows what pile'o'bile already is. You have no justification for what you did, but your ego is too big to realise you can actually do wrong with your power. You'll never admit it, but I wouldn't be surprised if some part of you is pissed that I defeated some of your ramblings, whether they were directly written by you or encouraged by you, it's still the kind of guff you normally blew, and I managed to defeat it. You, and the mods of the big sites will always have your ban buttons - but you will NEVER be able to justify your actions to me. That's how I know that I'm in the right, at least in situations like this - solidly backed justification is almost always absent.
 * Personal attacks + deleting comments in response to you = banno --ItsWalky 00:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. Sign your posts. --ItsWalky 00:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I have never intentionally deleted comments in response to me. I just moved one recently as it was in the middle of a paragraph of text. Not to mention that happened after you banned my original IP. Personal attacks alone are not grounds enough for a ban, especially when you're doing an awful, awful lot to be mercilessly torn into.

Need I point out that once again, you are unable to defend yourself properly? When does the "You're insane?" come? Ganging up of all your little friends since a majority always means you're right? Do you even realise what a fascist shithead you sound like? Just because you're an admin of a place doesn't give you a free pass to be a dick with it. There's a difference between what you can do and what you should do that you don't seem to have learned yet.

User:67.159.44.88


 * YOU BAN PEOPLE BECAUSE ****YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE

TRUTH****!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111twelve FUCKING FASCIST PIGCOP NAZI WIKIPEDO ASSHOLE  -hx 00:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * My gosh, now that I have seen someone mock the notion, it MUST be untrue. Please, where can I learn these 1337 debating skills?


 * Dude, I've been banned from twice as many forums as you, guaranfuckingteed, but they still let me post here because I'm not as goddamn retarded as you are. -hx 00:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * And can you demonstrate exactly how I'm more retarded than you? Or are you just, Walky style, dropping weighted terms to discredit someone's point of view without even trying?


 * 1. Hoop doesn't delete other people's comments on talk pages. 2. He actually signs his posts, which you've been asked to do many times, but haven't caught on. --FortMax 00:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't delete anything. If I did, it was an accident because someone posted right in the middle of text it wasn't meant to be in the middle of. Not signing my posts doesn't make me retarded since it's blatant when I'm saying something. --User:67.159.44.88

Actually - come to think of it, you make fun of the idea that anyone running a site can be Nazi, yet you still mention you got banned from many forums. Does that perhaps mean that you genuinely got banned for being an asshole and not opposing the staff/local clique like I did?


 * any rational moderator would warn several times before a ban
 * Not true, some things are auto-ban. I don't think you did any of them, but I'm just saying.
 * Dude- you got an expedited ban because you showed no signs of contrition, argued every point, used personal insults, refused to sign your posts even when repeatedly asked to (I had to go back into history and dig out which incoherent chunks of text where yours, because the posts weren't hierarchied properly so the debate was really hard to follow. This is why signin posts is important dumbfuck.)
 * And ultimately you got banned because you were making a major nuisance of yourself in without any correlating contribution to justify keeping you around. You're a negative.  You edited 3 articles- Fandom, Shortpacking and Ruined Forever- and all' of those edits got reverted because they either flames or crappy jokes that make the articles worse.  Even if I were to (generously) believe you didn't intend to start a fight, you picked the 3 flamebaitiest articles you could find and masturbated across them.  Allah forfend you should write an episode summary'' or something.
 * Unrelated- Walky can Talk:Fandom be semi-protected instead of full? Loserbot isn't registered. -Derik01:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Tip
If persistent trolls (especially those with offensive usernames) repeatedly re-create their user talk pages, the best method to deal with it would be to include the page on Project:Title blacklist and delete the vandalism user talk page. This would be better than protecting the actual page since the the vandalism page would technically not exist, won't come up in searches, and won't be indexed on search engines. In addition, the removal of such pages might discourage the trolls since they may see those pages as their accomplishments, which would encourage them to continue their disruption. GHe (Talk) 00:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Assaulthead
He's back. -- SFH 23:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * And again. -- SFH 00:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Once more. -- SFH 00:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And again. -- SFH 20:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Joepedia permission
You'll be happy to know that I have posted on the community talk forum as you suggested. I'll wait for the consensus. Thanks for letting me know before I stepped on EVERYBODY's toes. --Destron Commander 06:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Prowl 2
Could you merge Talk:Prowl 2 with Talk: Prowl (RID)? Nobody is going to be able to find it since Prowl 2 is a redirect. --FortMax 19:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

blocking us 4 no good reason
why are u blocking that kid who wasn't Kremzeek yet but now he is? we share our computer and before i was arcee, i couldn't edit either! Arcee 19:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I've got a bad feeling about this pair of users...--RosicrucianTalk 17:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

hey! i have nothing to do with what he's been doing! i don't add not-all-that-good pictures! and i still didn't get an answer from you, ItsWalky!Arcee 17:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you realize that if Kremzeek turns out to be evading his block via... say... Fire Convoy, the admins of this site might just have to say "the hell with this" and block your shared IP?--RosicrucianTalk 17:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

they did, nut-brain. Arcee 15:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * For forever this time. Though the insult definitely isn't helping.  --ItsWalky 15:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

WHAT?!?!?! THAT'S NOT NICE!!!! AND I WASN'T TALKING TO YOU ABOUT THE NUT-BRAIN THING!!!! Arcee 15:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You're not allowed to call ANYONE a nut-brain. Say goodbye forever now.  --ItsWalky 15:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Kremzeek! sockpuppet
User:Fire Convoy is a sockpuppet owned by User:Kremzeek!. --FortMax 18:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I warned you guys. Harsh moderation of troublemakers is better than keeping them around for 'comedy value'. --FFN 19:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * When the hell did I ever tell you I was keeping this person around for comedy value? --ItsWalky 21:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think he's referring to Assaulthead, and using initial (not current) "policy" with that character as though it applies to these. Don't know why, though. --Sntint 21:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I was not aware we updated our "policy" since the initial comedy stylings of Assaulthead. Either way, the point still stands - you could see 20 parsecs away that this character was not going to be a valuable contributor to the wiki, especially when he created an account for his 'sister'. --FFN 02:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Walky has been out of state the past few days, and thus unable to check on the wiki as normal. I don't think the humor or lack thereof played into this present situation. --Monzo 02:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

greetings, oh wise one...
I admire your great wisdom. I wish to be an admin like you. Is there anything I need to know about this? Pigs Fly 21:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Golly, I wonder who this could be. --Detour 21:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, that does sound interesting. I want to be an admin, too. But who are Kreemzek, Arcee, and Fire Can-Boy? Dewbot 22:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, okay. I see them up there on the blocking for no good reason topic. Man, they look like idiots. Dewbot 22:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * FYI, if you think insulting yourself is going to help, it won't. --FortMax 22:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

'''Stop insulting me! Those losers are not me!''' Dewbot 22:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry Willis, but your talk page has gotten too damned big. I've put all non-active topics into 2006 and 2007 archives except for the topics by Rosalie and Hilarious Stalker Guy. --FortMax 22:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, sir. --ItsWalky 02:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks like we need to talk to this "kid" again.
Kremzeek! is back again, saying he'll be "good."--RosicrucianTalk 17:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Guess who's a bored Kremzeek sockpuppet?--RosicrucianTalk 17:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I NEED AN ADMIN!
Hi, it's Mr. Florky from the Mini-con Matrix page. Something's wrong with the wiki. I'm not sure what key I hit but all of a sudden everything on this site is huge! I don't know who else to ask for help. Any idea how to fix it? Mr. Florky 15:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Fairly sure that's your text size on your browser, pardner.--RosicrucianTalk 15:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Kinda odd that it's only affecting this wiki. How do I fix it? Mr. Florky 15:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I repeat: How do I fix it?Mr. Florky 16:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Settle down, man. I can't tell you how to fix it if I'm getting edit conflicts because you're freaking out. Text size changes usually only affect one window until you close your browser. Go to view, then go to text size.--RosicrucianTalk 16:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)