Kibble

Kibble is a feature of many Transformers, both in their toys and in their animation/comic designs. In its modern usage (see below for earlier meanings) it refers to pieces which have no clear purpose in one mode but are there only because they are part of another mode. In most cases, "kibble" is used to refer pieces of the character's altmode which "hang" or stick out in their robot mode. Sometimes these pieces are there as a matter of aesthetics, and sometimes it's simply because there wasn't anyplace better to put the stuff. Much less frequently, the word is used to refer to "robot parts" which are badly hidden in an altmode.

Parts of an altmode which are merely visible in robot mode are not necessarily kibble. An altmode part which is well-integrated into the robot's form -- like the front of a car or truck that becomes a character's chest -- is not kibble because it is an integral part of the robot's body, rather than being "tacked on".

Examples of kibble
Although it was most prominent during the Beast Era and Robots in Disguise, kibble has been a part of Transformers from the very beginning. G1 Prowl, for example, has car doors that stick out behind his shoulders. The doors have no purpose in robot mode. They are not part of his actual body; they are just there, serving as decoration, but otherwise pointless. Those doors are kibble. In the robot modes of the G1 Seeker toys, the jet's nosecone and tailfins are also kibble. The jet wings, despite being one of the Seekers' most prominent features, are kibble as well because they are not needed for the robot mode.

One of the most infamous examples of beast kibble on a robot mode is Big Convoy from Beast Wars Neo. Many of the Neo toys are kibble heavy, with "panels" of beast skin attached to the robot body by swiveling rods. This is also common in the Car Robots/Robots in Disguise line, most notably with the Car Brothers (Prowl, Side Burn, and X-Brawn). (See shellformer.)

Connotation
Kibble is usually only brought up when it is being used derisively. Indeed, kibble often has a negative impact on a toy. It can restrict movement by getting in the way, it can make a toy unbalanced if it is too concentrated in one part of the body such as a "backpack", and it can simply make the robot look like a purely humanoid robot that has car or animal parts stuck to it, rather than being a robot composed of car or robot parts.

However, kibble serves an important purpose in Transformer design, often giving characters distinctive or interesting silhouettes. As mentioned above, the airplane wings on the Seekers' backs, as well as the doors on Prowl, are one of their most memorable features. They look "cool" even if they are not integrated into the robot body. Thus, kibble is not an intrinsically bad thing. Most Transformers have it, and it may even be seen as an integral part of some characters' designs.

Other meanings / development of term
It is unclear just how or when the word "kibble" entered the Transfan lexicon, but judging from its usage in the newsgroup alt.toys.transformers, it seems to have acquired its modern meaning sometime in 1998.

There are no recorded uses of the word "kibble" in Google's Usenet archive until the year 1996. In that year it was used only in reference to detachable parts and/or accessories, usually (but not always) in reference to pieces needed for combiners to combine properly, such as Scramble City feet, heads and fists. The very first instance of the word is in a post missing from the archive, but it appears quoted in other posts and appears to be the work of Lizard, who says:

"Now, if only there was a convenient place to store 'Combiner Kibble' -- all the hands, feet, chestplates, etc, that go into making a combiner... (Quoted text in &lt;3122E99A.19BB@texas.net&gt;, seemingly written by Lizard, Feb 1996)"

Lizard also used the word to refer to G1 Megatron's accesories in his BotCon 1996 report. Three others fans refer to "combiner kibble" in the first half of 1996 after Lizard's use of the term, all of them either placing it in quotes or adding an emoticon. It could be that Lizard actually coined the term, as he seems to be defining it in the text above, but he may have picked it up elsewhere and simply defined it because he knew it wasn't in wide use. Later in the year the word shows up about a dozen more times, always in reference to combiner pieces or other detachable parts.

The first archived use of the word kibble to refer to something other than detachable parts is a January 1997 review of Claw Jaw, by Dave Richter. "In beast mode, he looks great from head on, but the abdomen (made out of robot legs and jointed squid kibble) doesn't look too solid if viewed from the side." (&lt;32F023AC.397A@virginia.edu&gt; by Dave Richter, 29 Jan 1997) In March, Dave made a more explicitly-modern use of the word in response to another fan. This post serves reasonably well as a definition:

''IMO, toys should look cool from any angle. You should be able to turn a BW or any figure around have it look as cool as it does in the front. The rear should not be a place for a toy designer to throw any excess pieces on the figure that are not needed in robot mode. There are much more better designs than that.'' I don't know, you've got to put the animal kibble somewhere. This is standard TF fare; look at all the T-rex bitz Grimlock has hanging off his back. BW has alot of junk hanging off the back of many of it's entries, but it doesn't overbalance them, so what does it matter? (&lt;33237FCB.656E@virginia.edu&gt; Dave Richter, 9 Mar 1997)

Still, through 1997 the "detachable parts" sense was more heavily used, with 6 uses to the modern meaning's 3. In the previous year, 1996, the word was used to refer to detachable parts 16 times. In 1998 Dave Van Domelen began to use the word regularly in his posted toy reviews. He used it in both senses, but more often in the modern one. Overall, the word appeared in ATT 21 distinct times in 1998, with 13 of those being the new/current meaning. In 1999, usage exploded, with virtually all instances of the word being in its modern usage. The original "detachable parts" meaning has essentially become archaic and all-but-unknown. By Novermber 1999, the meaning was well-enough entrenched in ATT that Straight-Edge gave this definition, from which the meaning has not drifted at all in the years since:

"It means pieces of the alternate mode (Beast mode, vehicle mode) being not only visible, but actually hanging off the robot body. IE the Doors hanging off of Prowl's shoulders, and the Crab Legs/Claws on Rampage's robot mode. They are not part of an anthropomorphic robot, hence they are kibble. (&lt;19991109002603.08548.00002231@ng-fg1.aol.com&gt;, Straight-Edge, 9 Nov 1999)"

It can't be determined from the limited breadth of the Usenet archive how the word kibble shifted its meaning, but it seems reasonable to guess that the earliest uses in the modern sense were simply an extension of the idea of "parts that stick on". Kibble, as we discuss it today, is just that -- parts that are "stuck on".